<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palin&#8217;s public lie about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac&#8217;s private status</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liecount.com/2008/09/08/palins-public-lie-about-fannie-mae-and-freddie-macs-private-status/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liecount.com/2008/09/08/palins-public-lie-about-fannie-mae-and-freddie-macs-private-status/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://liecount.com/2008/09/08/palins-public-lie-about-fannie-mae-and-freddie-macs-private-status/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liecount.com/?p=45#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Yeah, this wasn't a lie as much as Palin having no idea what she's talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this wasn&#8217;t a lie as much as Palin having no idea what she&#8217;s talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Clark</title>
		<link>http://liecount.com/2008/09/08/palins-public-lie-about-fannie-mae-and-freddie-macs-private-status/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liecount.com/?p=45#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Hey Greg - we actually pulled this one off the count a couple days ago because of the possibility of inference of an indirect cost. It's worth noting that while I agree with your point about possible (and even likely) government costs, at the time of her statement the direct cost to the government was $0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Greg - we actually pulled this one off the count a couple days ago because of the possibility of inference of an indirect cost. It&#8217;s worth noting that while I agree with your point about possible (and even likely) government costs, at the time of her statement the direct cost to the government was $0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Luce</title>
		<link>http://liecount.com/2008/09/08/palins-public-lie-about-fannie-mae-and-freddie-macs-private-status/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Luce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liecount.com/?p=45#comment-98</guid>
		<description>The Fed took them over ~ September 6, but it was publicly accepted that this was coming AFAIK in June of this year. Some reports estimate the government's cash injection ultimately could be between $15 billion and $20 billion to save these 2. 

To improve your legitimacy perhaps you should take this one off the board. It makes no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fed took them over ~ September 6, but it was publicly accepted that this was coming AFAIK in June of this year. Some reports estimate the government&#8217;s cash injection ultimately could be between $15 billion and $20 billion to save these 2. </p>
<p>To improve your legitimacy perhaps you should take this one off the board. It makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJJScout</title>
		<link>http://liecount.com/2008/09/08/palins-public-lie-about-fannie-mae-and-freddie-macs-private-status/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>CJJScout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liecount.com/?p=45#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Roh roe!  Who owns them now, bitch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roh roe!  Who owns them now, bitch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

